data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25e93/25e93b0d625dae36911be7e60ac57a79bbb33350" alt="64 t bird"
I heard this from the people who built the car - uh, tooting my own horn, they sent me the radio for conversion. 1964 Ford thunderbird convertible, This car runs and drives great and overall in really good shape, It is a very solid car with no rust on the body.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a6d5/5a6d5c4e4e33060dbc75adf6ca38311a661fb14d" alt="64 t bird 64 t bird"
They only made one car this way, unlike most movies which utilize a handful of cars. Why? Because of the body - they were able to make it into a four-wheel-drive, so they could put it on a lift and film it with all four wheels turning. This is the Budd railroad car company, which might help explain why these things are built like a railroad car - almost 5,000 pounds and so solid that they could beat up everything else in a demolition derby.īut that also explains why the front wheel wells are so huge you could throw a party back there, but the engine compartment has no room - barely enough for a 390 big block.Īnother tidbit - they used a 1963 Thunderbird to film the movie Flubber.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb2f1/fb2f181815f7c43f846b3cbcc016596696dfc439" alt="64 t bird 64 t bird"
But I understand Ford didn't want to try unibody on their own, and had the Budd Company make the bodies for the 1961 Thunderbirds. I don't know if the front-drive would have been a good or bad thing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25e93/25e93b0d625dae36911be7e60ac57a79bbb33350" alt="64 t bird"